Showing posts with label Tim Walker. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tim Walker. Show all posts

Rant: Gilt-y As Charged

Just a temporary derailment from applicable fashion posts so I can get out what I've been thinking for a while...

When I first heard of Rue La La back in November of 2008, I thought I had died on gone to heaven. Then Gilt came along and my wallet just straight up died. As you have likely noticed (if you are a member of those sites and, you know, actually care), a large portion of the purchases on here have arrived at my doorstep via their shopping carts. My rabid fandom hit a fever pitch in January of 2010 when I went nutso from cabin fever and purchased the lion’s share of what you are now seeing come onto these pages as ‘purchases’. But…around a year ago this time, the love affair began to fade.

The business side of me wonders what has gone on behind the scenes at Gilt, mainly wondering if their sales numbers have gone down and if customer usage has dropped. I know my purchases are now few and far between since they changed their sales approach. Touting themselves as a ‘members only’ site (which is a massive joke because anyone and everyone can join), their sales used to be, well, sales. Like the kind you’d fight your own Mother for. And I got some good deals in my time – I bought this Alexander McQueen dress for $199, this Alexander McQueen scarf for $50, and this Fendi watch for $199. OK OK…I’m seeing somewhat of a pattern here – I can attest that the Alexander McQueen has skyrocketed on Gilt and to find even a shirt for less than $200 is going to be tough (since his untimely death left everyone wanting more.) But even the lower-high-end brands are only listing at around 50 percent off retail. And there are next to zero final sales to be found. Which his such a shame, because the scores were awesome! Now they just have hundreds of these variety-type sales where everything is just the same sale price as before because they’ve come down to one item of each in stock because someone returned it from the original sale. Lame. Where is the good sales? BRING BACK THE FINAL SALES and cheaper McQueen!

End rant.

Gratuitous and appropriate Tim Walker photo to break up the text:
timwalker1_637

ps - HAH! I'm not alone. Just read this comment by MargaretS on another site in response to the changes Gilt has been making to their sales:

Ugh. I'd wondered why Gilt's boutiques had gone so downhill lately. Now the reason is clear: the plebeians only are permitted to access the sloppy seconds (i.e., the "contemporary" or "up-and-coming" designers). Oh, and in the event that Gilt does have a boutique featuring a designer that you've actually heard of, the clothing is seasons' old and has been featured on the site at least three times before. In the past year, I've down scaled my Gilt purchases drastically because the boutiques are sub-par. Now, I'm going to curtail my shopping all together.
--Posted at 2/10/2011

Talking Myself Down

While I still have much to learn when it comes to saying “NO” to buying whatever amazing clothing is dangling in front of me at the moment (which is really why this blog exists in the first place), lately I have been exercising tremendous restraint and I’d like to offer my entirely unprofessional two-cents worth. Please try these at home. And if they don’t work, well, then you are really no worse off, right? Because you were going to buy it anyway.

Method a:
Imagine that you buy it and you’ve brought it home and it’s the next day and you want to wear it out. What do you pair it with? I specifically think of shoes at this point (unless of course, the purchase IS shoes and then you should BUY BUY BUY), and try to imagine if I can comfortably allocate a pair to this particular item. If I can allocate several, I’m on the path to purchase. If I’m pondering buying a purple and beige dress (like I am this very moment), that’s another story. I’m leaning towards no since I don’t want to wear black with it and I don’t have any decent beige shoes that I can wear for a long haul. Get my drift? It’s in there somewhere.

Method b:
You like it…is it because you already have something pretty close to it? And by pretty close, I mean if you are thinking about a black cardigan – do you have one in a similar style (regardless of the accent, design, fabric). Would you wear this piece with different items than the other one you have? Does if fill a wardrobe gap (however small)? It should – don’t just add substitute items – not worth the money! Which leads me to…

Method c:
Is it really worth the money? Now, this question is kind of invalid when buying designer items because, well, of course the answer is usually no. (I’m not immune to it though!) But even then…ask the questions in a and b but if you are passionate about the piece and its pricey AND designer (and if it is truly amazing, it likely is) and you’ll think about it for months (years?) after and wish you would have bought and it won’t make you destitute, buy it!! Um…I’m off track now. Maybe that leads me to…

Method? d:
Buy items that you are passionate about. Seriously. I’m talking about the moment you see it you are like, “!!!” It happens to me everyone once in a while. And TRY THINGS ON! But that doesn’t work so well if you are buying online…which I do all the time (as evidenced by the material in this blog.) If you can’t try it on, at least try to be familiar with the designer and know your size – go to a store and try the clothes on, take note, and then leave. Or guess. That sometimes works for me too. And sometimes not, as substantiated by the giant Y-3 dress hanging in my closet. Boo.

So there you have it – my jumbled, incoherent plea in attempting to save you some money. Did it work? I’m guessing not since you are here reading this blog and not shopping right now. So…yeah.

And what good is a blog without pictures? Here’s a few more (entirely unrelated) pretty pictures by the amazing Tim Walker.

patrick-wolfe-jpg

2569182224_d851db58e0

Tim Walker 37

Happy Wednesday!

My Rooftop Horse

I look at fashion editorials like a picture book. The clothes are ridiculously out of my price range and the models are impossibly thin doing things I won’t ever do (like petting a horse on a rooftop in Paris wearing wings.) So…what’s the point of them? Why do they even include the prices? A fun game I played with my in-laws during the summer while waiting in the ferry lineup was “Guess the price”. I’d show them the editorial and they’d guess the price. The conversation often went something like this:

Me: Guess how much this black mini skirt is?
Them: Um…$80.
Me: $1,500! Guess how much those gloves are?
Them: Um...$25.
Me: $350!


Is anyone really going to buy the plain white knit from Prada for $800? Are those the same people that buy fashion magazines? Oh whatever. Honestly, aside from some absolutely stellar photographers, I don’t give a hoot (ha!) what designer loaned their collection for some waif to wear (while petting her rooftop horse.) Did I just mention stellar editorial photographers? Oh yes…and do you want to see the work of one? TIM WALKER.

Karlie-Kloss-by-Tim-Walker1

VogueUS2006FebTheHandmaidenSTale

6a00d8341c5df753ef010535d61bc8970c-500wi

tim-walker-the-dress-lamp-tree-england-2002

tim walker01b
The geris say, "what?"